Web Traffic

http://www.SiteVacuum.com
Increase your website traffic in an easy and quick way. GMore works for everyone who is looking to market their website and increase their traffic flow. People such as Internet marketers, web site owners, bloggers and even me use this product. There are no subscription fees and it is completely free.

For every user that enters your website you will be able to provide them with the option of downloading GMore from your page and at the same time you will be marketing your services. But it doesnt stop there, your services will not only be marketed to them but also to anyone who might download GMore from your website. How it works: Once a user installs GMore from your website, your link or ad will pop up above all and any Google searches the individual runs. This provides return customers and exposes you to new customers by word of mouth.

GMore is just another helpful tool to help eliminate the need to pay for “hits”. Try it and I am sure it will help boost your traffic flow.

Start Now:
http://www.SiteVacuum.com

Duration : 0:1:35

(more…)

My site is http://mobilezone.awardspace.com/
It contains information about mobile phones, free SMS, funny sms reviews etc.
I want my site to be visited by more people.
How can I get a good traffic everyday.
(I have submitted my site to most of the search engines)

Use an incentive for your vistors. You have to make them want to come to website. Offer something free.

I can share with you the incentive I use and it works great!
Very inexpensive! One time fee of $8.00 and that’s it!

If interested email me at info@moneysaverstore.com

i had the game before then i lost it and now i got it back again.but all the cars and tracks i had earlier are gone.now there are only 4 tracks and a few cars?where’s the 911 GT 1?that was the best free racing car available in the game.do i have to play the full evolution thing to get my cars and tracks?is there no other way we can cheat through it or something?google didn’t help me much,those cheats didn’t work.
so if you have the game and know any cheat through which i can unlock all cars and tracks then please tell me.
and one more thing,i want all the cars and tracks in singleplayer mode.i know the trick about clicking on multiplayer and playing alone but i really want it on singleplayer so i can set the traffic.i like driving in heavy traffic and that facility is not in multiplayer mode?
help!!
if your answer helps and the cheat works then i’ll give you best answer-10 points and a thumbs up-1 point.11 points.please answer.
and don’t give me the cheats-gulliver,dakar,fuzzyfuz and all.i saw it on the web already.

beat the game noob

I want to increase the traffic of my new website free of cost.
So is there any website which can help me or any other way?
Please help.
If you help me out successfull , you will get a Free Membership of my website which is worth 80$.

The following article will prove helpful to you in streamlining your SEO metatags in order to attract more Net traffic by higher search engine placement.

The most effective way to advertise on the Internet is
to first set up a website and publish its domain name
on major search directories such as Google.com,
Yahoo.com [at http://www.google.com/addurl/?...... and
MSN.com since 85% of Internet shoppers rely on these
search directories to provide them with goods and
services. In a sense, these search directories are a
very large Internet Yellow Pages.

Nevertheless, should your website or opening webpage
fail to contain "generic" keywords, then anyone using
such "generic" queries will not be able to discover
your website. Your domain name [URL] of your website,
in a sense, will be invisible, undiscoverable.

You may want to consider some simple algorithms which,
when observed and committed in designing of a website
with placement of various critical metatags that can
surely achieve a high search engine presence and
increase Internet traffic to your website. These
metatag strategies work well with published webpages
at Google and Yahoo.

Design: Should you create an extensive Flash-based
website, make sure to fill-in the property entries
such as the Title, Description and Keywords. Failing
to do so, leaves no hard HTML or ALT resource that can
be readily indexed by search robots. Also consider the
Internet audience and their incoming setup. For
example, if they are on analog/dialup, Flash webpages
take too long to load up and therefore analog users
will likely lose interest and discontinue entering the
Flash site. On the other hand, anyone on hi-speed DSL
lines, will welcome Flash pages which load quickly. So
before designing a pure Flash websitge, ask the simple
question, "Who’s my end user – is he on dialup or
DSL?" And if you had to choose between these two users
for maximum marketability, then select analog users
since 80% of most resident users are still analog
Internet subscribers and pure HTML designed webpages
is best for them.

A non-Flash-based website which relies on hard text,
is far easier to be indexed by search robots. Limit
the use of stylized text saved as .gifs since as a
graphic, they are not indexable by search robots.

Avoid use of frames since any number of search robots
are unable to properly classify textual material.

Placement of Metatags:

A ranking or search order does take place with Google
and Yahoo and it begins with the "Title" metag which
should consist of no more than 60 characters separated
by commas. The "Title" should describe in generic terms, the goods and services, followed by a location from which the resource is located, i.e., city, state. The placement of a domain name which is not generic within the "Title" is not appropriate, unless your
domain name is a major recognizable brand name.

The second metatag is the "Description" which is
usually up to 41 words to form a complete paragraph which
best describes one’s goods and services. It is not merely a list.

And the very last category – "Keywords" are also
somewhat limited to 15 words which can be plural
and compound in nature. Again, avoid multiple entries
which could be mistaken as "spamdexed entries" which
is defined as the loading, and submission of
repetitive words into a particular metatag category.
"Spamdexing" when discovered on a webpage and reported
to Google’s spamreport.com can result in the
elimination of your website from their search
directory.

Here’s an example of a very highly-placed website on
Google.com: Begin with the very "generic" search query
"sandwiches downtown los angeles," taking note to not
abbreviate Los Angeles to "LA" and of course, leave
out the parentheses ("). It will bring up some 2.4
million+ search results. Check out where "Nazos.net"
is ranked. It’s on the FIRST FRONT PAGE [ranked #5]!
Again, Nazos.net’s high web presence was achieved by
proper web design and placement of relevant metatags
according to Google’s publication guidelines.

Good luck!

Well my site hq4apple.com has not gotten many views. It is really cool and i want more people to see it. How do i do this?

Try word of mouth techniques. This is a simple form that allows your website visitors to tell other people about your site by sending a simple email. I use this viral method on my site and I was surprised at how many people use it. I receive carbon copies of all messages so I can keep track of what people are saying.

The Cult of the Amateur
Sign In to E-Mail or Save This
Print
Share
Digg
Facebook
Newsvine
Permalink

By MICHIKO KAKUTANI
Published: June 29, 2007
Digital utopians have heralded the dawn of an era in which Web 2.0 — distinguished by a new generation of participatory sites like MySpace.com and YouTube.com, which emphasize user-generated content, social networking and interactive sharing — ushers in the democratization of the world: more information, more perspectives, more opinions, more everything, and most of it without filters or fees. Yet as the Silicon Valley entrepreneur Andrew Keen points out in his provocative new book, “The Cult of the Amateur,” Web 2.0 has a dark side as well.

Skip to next paragraph

Catherine Betts
Andrew Keen

THE CULT OF THE AMATEUR
How Today’s Internet Is Killing Our Culture
By Andrew Keen
228 pages. Doubleday. $22.95.

Tony Cenicola/The New York Times
Mr. Keen argues that “what the Web 2.0 revolution is really delivering is superficial observations of the world around us rather than deep analysis, shrill opinion rather than considered judgment.” In his view Web 2.0 is changing the cultural landscape and not for the better. By undermining mainstream media and intellectual property rights, he says, it is creating a world in which we will “live to see the bulk of our music coming from amateur garage bands, our movies and television from glorified YouTubes, and our news made up of hyperactive celebrity gossip, served up as mere dressing for advertising.” This is what happens, he suggests, “when ignorance meets egoism meets bad taste meets mob rule.”

This book, which grew out of a controversial essay published last year by The Weekly Standard, is a shrewdly argued jeremiad against the digerati effort to dethrone cultural and political gatekeepers and replace experts with the “wisdom of the crowd.” Although Mr. Keen wanders off his subject in the later chapters of the book — to deliver some generic, moralistic rants against Internet evils like online gambling and online pornography — he writes with acuity and passion about the consequences of a world in which the lines between fact and opinion, informed expertise and amateurish speculation are willfully blurred.

For one thing, Mr. Keen says, “history has proven that the crowd is not often very wise,” embracing unwise ideas like “slavery, infanticide, George W. Bush’s war in Iraq, Britney Spears.” The crowd created the tech bubble of the 1990s, just as it created the disastrous Tulipmania that swept the Netherlands in the 17th century.

Mr. Keen also points out that Google search results — which answer “search queries not with what is most true or most reliable, but merely what is most popular” — can be manipulated by “Google bombing” (which “involves simply linking a large number of sites to a certain page” to “raise the ranking of any given site in Google’s search results”). And he cites a recent Wall Street Journal article reporting that hot lists on social networking Web sites are often shaped by a small number of users: that at Digg.com, which has 900,000 registered users, 30 people were responsible at one point for submitting one-third of the postings on the home page; and at Netscape.com, a single user was behind 217 stories over a two-week period, or 13 percent of all stories that reached the most popular list in that period.

Because Web 2.0 celebrates the “noble amateur” over the expert, and because many search engines and Web sites tout popularity rather than reliability, Mr. Keen notes, it’s easy for misinformation and rumors to proliferate in cyberspace. For instance, the online encyclopedia Wikipedia (which relies upon volunteer editors and contributors) gets way more traffic than the Web site run by Encyclopedia Britannica (which relies upon experts and scholars), even though the interactive format employed by Wikipedia opens it to postings that are inaccurate, unverified, even downright fraudulent. This year it was revealed that a contributor using the name Essjay, who had edited thousands of Wikipedia articles and was once one of the few people given the authority to arbitrate disputes between writers, was a 24-year-old named Ryan Jordan, not the tenured professor he claimed to be.

Since contributors to Wikipedia and YouTube are frequently anonymous, it’s hard for users to be certain of their identity — or their agendas. Postings about political candidates, for instance, can be made by opponents disguising their motives; and propaganda can be passed off as news or information. For that matter, as Mr. Keen points out, the idea of objectivity is becoming increasingly passé in the relativistic realm of the Web, where bloggers cherry-pick information and promote speculation and spin as fact. Whereas historians and journalists traditionally strived to deliver the best available truth possible, many bloggers revel in their own subjectivity, and many Web 2.0 users simply use the Net, in Mr. Keen’s words, to confirm their “own partisan views and link to others with the same ideologies.” What’s more, as mutually agreed upon facts become more elusive, informed debate about important social and political issues of the day becomes more difficult as well.

Although Mr. Keen’s objections to the publishing and distribution tools the Web provides to aspiring artists and writers sound churlish and elitist — he calls publish-on-demand services “just cheaper, more accessible versions of vanity presses where the untalented go to purchase the veneer of publication” — he is eloquent on the fallout that free, user-generated materials is having on traditional media.

Mr. Keen argues that the democratized Web’s penchant for mash-ups, remixes and cut-and-paste jobs threaten not just copyright laws but also the very ideas of authorship and intellectual property. He observes that as advertising dollars migrate from newspapers, magazines and television news to the Web, organizations with the expertise and resources to finance investigative and foreign reporting face more and more business challenges. And he suggests that as CD sales fall (in the face of digital piracy and single-song downloads) and the music business becomes increasingly embattled, new artists will discover that Internet fame does not translate into the sort of sales or worldwide recognition enjoyed by earlier generations of musicians.

“What you may not realize is that what is free is actually costing us a fortune,” Mr. Keen writes. “The new winners — Google, YouTube, MySpace, Craigslist, and the hundreds of start-ups hungry for a piece of the Web 2.0 pie — are unlikely to fill the shoes of the industries they are helping to undermine, in terms of products produced, jobs created, revenue generated or benefits conferred. By stealing away our eyeballs, the blogs and wikis are decimating the publishing, music and news-gathering industries that created the original content those Web sites ‘aggregate.’ Our culture is essentially cannibalizing its young, destroying the very sources of the content they crave.”

Sorry, but I am unable to provide you with rebuttals. This piece is very engaging and worthy of dissimination. I will pass it along to help shine light on the problem of the new web generations.

I have my web site http://www.giftforus.com and I launched 6 months ago. but still I am not getting good visitors I am using google Analysis it is showing me 4-5 visitor daily. Please any one can help me how to get more traffic.

Promote it as a site that welcomes anti-American sentiment and encourages bitterness and class envy. Liberals flock to site like these and they may even crash it if you’re not prepared for the sheer number of them.

What are some good free ways to generate web traffic for my site – www.galaxygui.com? I’ve done a few things submit to search engines, post signatures in other forums, refer people, post classifieds and digg articles but none seem to be working that well. Anyone have any ideas?

Have really good content on your web site that a lot of people would interested in viewing.

Background:

I have a CGI script (served by Apache on Linux) that gets called about once per second or more on my web-site. This script calls (via perl LWP) a webservice on an external site (see http://gisdata.usgs.gov), parses the results and returns a subset of them.

Problem:

It usually returns pretty quick (<200ms), but sometimes there is 1+ seconds lost in just resolving the IP of the domain of the 3rd party web-service.

Solutions?

I could hard-code the IP, but that’s always error-prone, there’s got to be a better way. Plus they’re using a load-balancer, so I don’t want to target one IP if they expect the traffic to be balanced.

What I want to avoid is the round-trip to my ISP’s name-server for *each and every* request to resolve the same domain.

I think I could run bind on the server, and use that to resolve, but is there a simpler way? An app I can run in the background that will just keep track of commonly-looked-up DNS names?

it’s not perl it’s not apache…. dns caching is tricky… I know it can be managed but I don’t know enough to shoot from the hip.

But, you can simply add the gov site with which you are concerned to your /etc/hosts file and bypass the dns… of course if our government moves, you will have to update that file… but since you know perl… you can do a lookup ever hour or day and fix the hosts file!

the time difference is the lookup vs using the cached address.

depending on the kind of load balancing they are doing, they may have just 1 outside address, then the route to various inside addresses.

Also, you could do your own dns… HA HA!

Its is for the purpose of estimating sales generated through online advertising.
This is for the purpose of calculating online advertising revenue. Please mention the source of the statistics you provide.

try www.quantcast.com